What A Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter Means
A Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter, also known as a Comprehensive Permit, is a crucial document in the context of affordable housing development in the state of Massachusetts. Chapter 40B refers to a state law that encourages the construction of affordable housing units in communities where less than 10% of the housing stock is considered affordable, as defined by the law. Millbury's Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI), as reported by the Town, registers at less than 5%, thereby falling short of the state's established benchmark used to assess affordable housing accessibility. In the past, affordable housing units had a designated affordability period of 15-25 years before transitioning back to market-rate units, an example being Cordis Mills (now known as Spark Millbury). The current standard, however, ensures their affordability in perpetuity, meaning they remain affordable indefinitely.
Here's what a Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter is and what it means:
Authorization for Affordable Housing Development: A Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter is issued by the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) to a developer or organization seeking to build an affordable housing project in a municipality with a housing shortage.
Streamlined Zoning Process: One of the key benefits of obtaining this letter is that it allows the developer to bypass certain local zoning restrictions and regulations that might otherwise hinder or delay the construction of affordable housing. This is often necessary because local zoning rules can be quite restrictive and make it difficult to build affordable housing in some communities.
Requirements for Eligibility: To obtain a Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter, the developer must meet certain criteria. These criteria typically include setting aside a percentage of the housing units in the proposed development as affordable for low and moderate-income households.
Local Input and Public Hearings: While the letter grants the developer the ability to move forward with the project, it doesn't mean that the local community has no say in the matter. Public hearings are usually held to gather input from residents and local officials, and the developer is often required to make some modifications to address concerns raised during this process.
State Oversight: The DHCD monitors and oversees the development process to ensure compliance with the affordable housing requirements and other relevant regulations.
Affordable Housing Goals: The ultimate goal of Chapter 40B and the Project Eligibility Letter is to increase the supply of affordable housing in communities with a shortage. This helps address housing affordability issues and provide housing options for lower-income individuals and families.
In summary, a Chapter 40B Project Eligibility Letter is a significant authorization that allows developers to construct affordable housing projects in municipalities with housing shortages, even when local zoning regulations might otherwise prevent such development. It's a means to promote the creation of more affordable housing options in Massachusetts communities to address housing affordability challenges.
Local Input and Public Hearings
It is of utmost importance that both our neighborhood and the entire community to maintain a strong commitment to addressing the factual and evidence-supported “local concerns” during every public hearing with the Millbury Board of Appeals that fall within the following categories:
Health
Safety
Environmental
Design
Open Space
Planning
Other Local Concerns (related to physical development of the site)
All participants should bear in mind that emotions or personal opinions are not pertinent considerations within the context of Chapter 40B-related public hearings. These hearings primarily rely on objective criteria, data, and relevant regulations to make informed decisions regarding affordable housing developments. The focus should be on factual information, legal requirements, and the impact of proposed projects on the community, examples include, but are not limited to the Millbury Zoning Bylaws, the Millbury Subdivision Rules and Regulations, the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B, and the Handbook: Approach to Chapter 40B Design Reviews.
The proposed Rice Pond Village project in Chapter 40B should undergo a comprehensive assessment considering the prior denial of the initial proposal for 56 condominiums due to unresolved public safety and wetlands concerns. Although the proposal was later reduced to 46 condominiums during the public hearing process, these safety issues remained unaddressed. Similarly, the proposed Medfield Meadows project, initially presented as a Chapter 40B development featuring 200 units across two parcels of land flanking North Meadows Road (Route 27) in Medfield, Massachusetts, was outright rejection by MassHousing even after it was downsized to 183 units.
Recognizing the importance of acknowledging that not all Chapter 40B projects secure approval, it is noteworthy that there are individuals within our town government who advocate for prematurely conceding defeat, despite contrary decisions. In response to the rejection, the developer of Medfield Meadows took significant steps to redesign the project, reducing it to a mere 36 units located on the north side of North Meadows Road. This remarkable 82% decrease from the original 200-unit proposal has resulted in the project being renamed Medfield Green. This new design aligns harmoniously with the neighborhood's scale and architectural typology, demonstrating a commitment to addressing community concerns and enhancing the project's compatibility with its surroundings.
By joining forces, our neighborhood and the broader Millbury community can strive to achieve outcomes similar to those seen with Medfield Meadows (outright denial) and Medfield Green (dramatic scaling-back and architectural redesign to harmonize with the neighborhood). These desired outcomes include substantial downsizing or the complete rejection of the proposed Rice Pond Village project. It is abundantly clear that the selected project site is fundamentally ill-suited for a development of this considerable scale, primarily due to the extensively documented and unaddressed public safety concerns; and in a Suburban II Zoning District, such as Rice Road, which has sections with a pavement width less than the required minimum of 22 feet, the construction of multifamily residences is not allowed.
If we fail to unite in our efforts to mitigate, oppose, or prevent this poorly thought-out Chapter 40B project, we risk defeat before even starting. Our neighborhood and community are deserving of our advocacy. To clarify, we are not simply a group of NIMBYs; rather, we seek safe, responsible, and suitable development, which the current proposal does not align with. Hence, the developer, Steven F. Venincasa, has turned to a Chapter 40B application, thereby carrying out his widely perceived implied threat against the Millbury Planning Board (and consequently, the town) and our neighborhood for their refusal to comply with his demands, which disregarded legitimate public safety concerns, such as the Providence & Worcester railroad crossing, the two non-standard intersections at both ends of Rice Road, the inadequacies of Rice Road itself, even after the repaving and minor increases in width, expanding from 16 feet to less than the required minimum 22 feet in sections of the road, and the absence of architectural harmony with the neighborhood and its surroundings. According to Millbury Subdivision Rules and Regulations, for a development such as the one proposed, Rice Road must adhere to specific standards, including a minimum pavement width of 32 feet, accompanied by a 3-foot grass strip, a 5-foot sidewalk, and a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Rice Road currently has a right-of-way width of 40 feet, making it ineligible for eminent domain under state law.
For more information, please refer to: