MBTA Communities Act Dashboard

The MBTA Communities Act dashboard was compiled, developed, and is maintained through a collaborative effort of individual residents, community officials and employees. It tracks zoning votes, referendums, state compliance status, and more. This resource is freely available for individuals to use for community advocacy, raising awareness, meeting assets, and other purposes.

What is the law?

Section 3A: Multi-family zoning as-of-right in MBTA communities

Section 3A. (a)(1) An MBTA community shall have a zoning ordinance or by-law that provides for at least 1 district of reasonable size in which multi-family housing is permitted as of right; provided, however, that such multi-family housing shall be without age restrictions and shall be suitable for families with children. For the purposes of this section, a district of reasonable size shall: (i) have a minimum gross density of 15 units per acre, subject to any further limitations imposed by section 40 of chapter 131 and title 5 of the state environmental code established pursuant to section 13 of chapter 21A; and (ii) be located not more than 0.5 miles from a commuter rail station, subway station, ferry terminal or bus station, if applicable.

(b) An MBTA community that fails to comply with this section shall not be eligible for funds from: (i) the Housing Choice Initiative as described by the governor in a message to the general court dated December 11, 2017; (ii) the Local Capital Projects Fund established in section 2EEEE of chapter 29; (iii) the MassWorks infrastructure program established in section 63 of chapter 23A, or (iv) the HousingWorks infrastructure program established in section 27 of chapter 23B.

(c) The executive office of housing and livable communities, in consultation with the executive office of economic development, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, shall promulgate guidelines to determine if an MBTA community is in compliance with this section.

Things that make you go hmm…

One has to wonder: if there truly is a housing crisis, every community should contribute to addressing this statewide crisis. However, if everyone is expected to pitch in, why are only 177 out of 351 communities “mandated” to take action in this “crisis”? Why, then, are 49.6% of Massachusetts communities, including Boston, Avon, Pepperell, Bolton, Hudson, Berlin, Clinton, Boylston, parts of Worcester County, the entirety of Cape Cod, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and the counties of Berkshire, Franklin, Hampshire, and Hampden, exempt? What is the relationship between the MBTA transit system and the alleged housing crisis? Affordability is a major concern for most people, so why does this amendment to Chapter 40A §3A not address it? At a minimum, that is one question that needs to be answered by the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and the Secretary of the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC).

Community Zoning Amendment Compliance Status Compliance
Abington Passed Compliant 2024
Acton Passed Compliant 2024
Amesbury Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Andover Passed Compliant 2024
Arlington Passed Compliant 2024
Ashburnham Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Ashby Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Ashland Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Attleboro Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Auburn Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Ayer Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Bedford Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Bellingham Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Belmont Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Berkley Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Beverly Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Billerica Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Bourne Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Boxborough Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Boxford Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Braintree Passed Compliant 2023
Bridgewater Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Brockton Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Brookline Passed Compliant 2023
Burlington Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Cambridge Passed Compliant 2023
Canton Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Carlisle Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Carver Failed Interim Compliance 2025
Chelmsford Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Chelsea Passed Compliant 2023
Cohasset Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Concord Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Danvers Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Dedham Passed Compliant 2024
Dover Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Dracut Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Duxbury Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
East Bridgewater Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Easton Passed Compliant 2024
Essex Passed Interim Compliance 2025
Everett Passed Conditional Compliance 2023
Fall River Passed Compliant 2024
Fitchburg Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Foxborough Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Framingham Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Franklin Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Freetown Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Georgetown Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Gloucester Pending SJC Ruling Reset 2024
Grafton Passed Compliant 2024
Groton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Groveland Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Halifax Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Hamilton Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Hanover Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Hanson Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Harvard Passed Compliant 2025
Haverhill Passed Compliant 2024
Hingham Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Holbrook Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Holden Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Holliston Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Hopkinton Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Hull Passed Compliant 2024
Ipswich Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Kingston Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Lakeville Passed Interim Compliance 2025
Lancaster Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Lawrence Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Leicester Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Leominster Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Lexington Passed Compliant 2024
Lincoln Passed Compliant 2024
Littleton Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Lowell Passed Compliant 2024
Lunenburg Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Lynn Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Lynnfield Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Malden Passed Conditional Compliance 2023
Manchester-by-the-Sea Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Mansfield Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Marblehead Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Marlborough Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Marshfield Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Maynard Passed Compliant 2024
Medfield Passed Compliant 2024
Medford Passed Compliant 2023
Medway Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Melrose Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Merrimac Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Methuen Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Middleborough Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Middleton Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Millbury Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Millis Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Milton Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Nahant Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Natick Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Needham Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2024
New Bedford Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Newbury Passed Interim Compliance 2025
Newburyport Pending Interim Compliance 2024
Newton Passed Conditional Compliance 2023
Norfolk Passed Interim Compliance 2024
North Andover Passed Compliant 2024
North Attleborough Passed Interim Compliance 2024
North Reading Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Northborough Passed Compliant 2024
Northbridge Passed Compliant 2024
Norton Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Norwell Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Norwood Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Paxton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Peabody Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Pembroke Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Plymouth Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Plympton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Princeton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Quincy Passed Compliant 2023
Randolph Passed Compliant 2024
Raynham Pending SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Reading Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Rehoboth Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Revere Passed Compliant 2023
Rochester Passed Interim Compliance 2025
Rockland Passed Compliant 2024
Rockport Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Rowley Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Salem Passed Compliant 2024
Salisbury Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Saugus Pending SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Scituate Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Seekonk Failed Interim Compliance 2024
Sharon Passed Compliant 2024
Sherborn Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Shirley Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Shrewsbury Pending SJC Ruling Reset 2024
Somerville Passed Compliant 2023
Southborough Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Sterling Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Stoneham Passed Compliant 2024
Stoughton Passed Compliant 2024
Stow Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Sudbury Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Sutton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Swampscott Passed Compliant 2024
Taunton Passed Compliant 2024
Tewksbury Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Topsfield Passed Interim Compliance 2025
Townsend Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Tyngsborough Passed Compliant 2024
Upton Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Wakefield Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Walpole Passed Compliant 2024
Waltham Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Wareham Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Watertown Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Wayland Passed Compliant 2024
Wellesley Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Wenham Postponed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
West Boylston Passed Interim Compliance 2024
West Bridgewater Pending Interim Compliance 2025
West Newbury Pending Interim Compliance 2025
Westborough Passed Compliant 2024
Westford Passed Compliant 2024
Westminster Failed Interim Compliance 2025
Weston Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Westwood Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Weymouth Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Whitman Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Wilmington Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Winchester Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Winthrop Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025
Woburn Passed Interim Compliance 2024
Worcester Passed Compliant 2024
Wrentham Failed SJC Ruling Reset 2025

The Microsoft Excel (.xlsx) and Comma Separated Value (.csv) files available for download offer greater detail than the above table due to space limitations.

In the “Zoning Amendment” or “Voter Action” section, “Passed” signifies that a simple majority of the community approved the MBTA Communities Act zoning bylaw/map amendment during their town or city meeting. However, it's important to note that “Passed” does not mean the state Attorney General and the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) will automatically consider the zoning district as “compliant.” Conversely, “Failed” signifies the opposite outcome, or that a referendum overturned an adoption decision made during the town/city meeting. In the “Zoning Amendment” section, “Postponed” indicates one of two things: either the town or city meeting has been rescheduled to later date, or the community has decided not to take any action, such as the case of Holden. In the “Zoning Amendment” section, “Pending” indicates that no vote by the town or city has been taken and is scheduled for a future date.

In the “Compliance” section, the MBTA Communities Act Compliance Date is specified as December 31 of the indicated year.

Compliance Status was updated as of January 14, 2025, by EOHLC.

Provide Updates

Community members, municipal employees, and others work hard to keep this information up to date. If you have any updates, notice missing details, or spot inaccuracies, please fill out this form to help us maintain accuracy. Thank you for your attention and support! Updates will be published weekly on weekends.

This data is being provided for informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, it is subject to change, update, or correction.