Once more, members of the Millbury Board of Appeals raised the question of reducing the project's density from 192 units to a more suitable number for its location. In response, James Venincasa asserted that the 192 apartments were non-negotiable. A board member highlighted to the developer that they currently faced two potential dissenting votes, needing only one more to potentially reject the project.

Nearly every voting member of the Millbury Board of Appeals raised inquiries about reducing the project's density, height, and other aspects of the project, sharing their viewpoints while emphasizing that they personally had not made any decisions regarding the viability of the proposed project. Kenneth Perro, the chairperson of the Millbury Board of Appeals, conferred with Judy Barrett, the town's Chapter 40B consultant, regarding waivers and the subsequent steps, while other members made additional inquiries. Judy Barrett provided clear instructions, indicating that the board must evaluate each waiver request independently and make decisions based on the information presented. She clarified that while the board can suggest changes to the developers, ultimately, the decision to implement changes rests with the developers, and the board must determine whether waivers are justified.

Kenneth Perro, the chairperson of the Millbury Board of Appeals, initiated the public hearing and clarified that testimony or public comments would not be received. He elucidated that the developers had presented documents that both the board and the town's peer reviewers hadn't thoroughly examined and addressed. Consequently, the public hearing would be postponed until March 13, 2024. The board then voted to continue the public hearing and adjourn.